국내도서

>

전공도서/대학교재

>

사회과학계열

>

정치학

• 
• 제휴몰 주문 시 고객보상, 일부 이벤트 참여 및 증정품 증정, 하루/당일 배송에서 제외되므로 참고 바랍니다.

• 
• 도서  > 전공도서/대학교재  > 사회과학계열  > 정치학

• 
• 
• Issues and Perspectives in The Korean Peace Process This book seeks to bring about a greater understanding of Korean peace process by exploring past and present policy toward North Korea since the 1990s. The Korean peace process was initiated in order to resolve the inter-Korean conflict and denuclearize North Korea. In 1998, South Korean President Kim Dae-jung announced a Sunshine Policy towards North Korea and an Inter-Korean summit was held in 2000. In 2006, North Korea conducted its first nuclear test. A second inter-Korean summit was held in 2007. In 2017 South Korean President Moon Jae-in returned to the Sunshine Policy. A summit between Moon and Kim took place in the South Korean zone of the Joint Security Area, and they signed the Panmunjom Declaration pledging to work towards a permanent peace to the Korean peninsula and the complete denuclearization of Korea.
• 
• Preface 5 Introduction Chapter 1 The Korean Peace Process in the Context of Conflicts in the Global and Regional Orders Sang-Hwan Lee ? Scott Gates 9 Understanding of the Korean Peace Process Chapter 2 The Direction of the Korean Peninsula's Peace from the Perspective of Peace Studies Soo Hwan Hwang 29 Chapter 3 South Korea's Tasks on the Peace Process & Unification Policy Sukhoon Hong 52 Diplomatic Approach to the Korean Peace Process Chapter 4 How Commitment Problems Affect the Prospects for Peace in the Korean Peninsula Scott Gates ? Havard Mokleiv Nyg￥rd 75 Chapter 5 A Systematic Analysis of the Trump Foreign Policy: Implications for Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula Dongsoo Kim 104 Chapter 6 The Impact of U.S.-China Power Competition on the Korean Peace Process Wonjae Hwang 124 Chapter 7 Sunrise, Sunset: The Rise and Fall of Inter-Korean Economic Relations Inhan Kim 142 Implementation and Execution of the Korean Peace Process Chapter 8 Pol...itical Oppression, Human Rights, and UN Targeted Sanctions: A Case of North Korea Jiyoun Park ? Hyun Jin Choi 167 Chapter 9 Bridge between South and North Korea: Analysis of South Korean Aid to North Korea for Peace in the Korean Peninsula Youngwan Kim ? Jaeyoung Hur ? Jiyoun Park 191 Chapter 10 What Do We Know and Do Not Know?: Attitudes Toward North Korea and Unification Jaeyoung Hur ? Sanghoon Park 214 Chapter 11 Japan and South Korea: Can they get along by overcoming the challenges? Atsushi Tago 242 Future of the Korean Peace Process Chapter 12 Be Careful What You Wish For: Security Challenges Facing the Korean Peninsula During a Potential Unification Process Mason Richey ? Daewon Ohn ? Jangho Kim ? Jae Jeok Park 267 Chapter 13 Challenges and Opportunities of the 'Korean Peace Process ' in the Moon Jae-in Government: Lessons from 'NAPCI' in the Park Geun-hye Government Eunmi Choi 299 Authors’ Bios 326
• 
• Chapter 1. Introduction The Korean Peace Process in the Context of Conflicts in the Global and Regional Orders Sang-Hwan Lee (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) Scott Gates (University of Oslo and Peace Research Institute Oslo(PRIO)) COVID-19 may one day be recorded in history as the origin of the Neo-Cold War between the US and China. A new global order has emerged in the wake of the virus's spread, characterized by de-globalization and digitalization of the global community. COVID-19 has accelerated the de-globalization trends in domestic and global societies and deviations from shared values have resulted in a Neo-Cold War Order. The Neo-Cold War is a product of the US-China hegemonic struggles in the post-cold war period in association with China's rapid economic and military growth. Their value clashes further have riven the relationship. The shift from a world of globalized and open societies to an international order based on de-globalization and closed societies concerns us. A valuable lesson COVID-19 taught us is that communitarian cooperation and open societies guarantee an optimistic future in the global order. The rise of China affects not only US hegemony but constitutes a more immediate regional power transition with Japan in northeast Asia and plays a critical role in shaping the peace process in the Korean peninsula. Indeed, to understand the Korean peace process, we must consider these three different layers of politics, in the Korean Peninsula, Northeast Asia, and the global order. All three layers will be examined through the lens of power transition theory. The rise of China profoundly shapes all of these relations. The Global Order: From US Preponderance to Sino-US Competition [China as a dissatisfied challenger] For almost two decades, the most significant feature of the global balance of power has been the steady rise of Chinese economic and military strength, as well as the spread of its soft power. Indeed, the most important, and persistent, issue relating to the rise of China is whether China is willing and able to take over as the lone superpower (Lee & Kim 2016). Given China's capabilities and intentions, China cannot initiate the power transition for the time being. The US still maintains supremacy in terms of military capabilities, usage of IT technologies, and physical quality of life. China will take another couple of decades at the very least to develop its capabilities to reach parity with the US. China also faces fundamental difficulties in eliciting a power transition away from the US, because the US is a different type of hegemonic power than any previous rising state has faced. Representing Western civilization, the current international order led by the US is easy to integrate into, but difficult to deconstruct. In this light, China's power transition, and taking over as global hegemon seems hardly possible for the time being (Lee & Kim 2016). There have been many differing analyses conce...rning a potential power transition from the US to China. Chinese analysts have argued that current US power is on the decline; that the US-led unipolar system is unambiguously creeping towards an end and making room for a multipolar system; and that the current international order may be under a radical shift. Some have highlighted the US' neglect of its soft power and its subsequent loss of legitimacy as a leader in the international arena (Lam, 2010; Lampton, 2010; and Saunders, 2010). Reviewing changes in Chinese perceptions of US power and the future international order, American China experts have suggested that the major source of the current Sino-American confrontation is the serious Chinese miscalculation, stemming from the combination of its diplomatic overconfidence and its internal insecurity (Nye, 2010; Glaser and Morris, 2009). Notably, given the growing diversity within the Chinese academia and society, some Chinese scholars have cautiously and rationally warned against drawing premature conclusions. Generally positioned in the higher echelons of academia and representing the majority opinion, these scholars have argued that no conspicuous rationale suggests that the US is falling in an irrecoverable setback and have also ruled out the possibility of a fundamental change to the global balance of power. Given the current international environment, they insist, no state has been able to constitute a comprehensive challenge against the US, and the current international power structure of "one superpower and many great powers" will continue for the foreseeable future. Admitting that there is no decline in US power and no fundamental changes in the global structure, these scholars have drawn a conclusion that China should avoid becoming embroiled in the central maelstrom of global politics and prioritize, instead, managing its own domestic affairs (Lam 2010). Critical to US and China relations and the prospects of a power transition is the degree of satisfaction with the current global system exhibited by China. System satisfaction can be understood in terms of bilateral coordination, cooperation, and recognition between the US and China. We draw on a prominent study that employs content analysis of articles appearing in Chosun Ilbo (a prominent South Korean newspaper) from the period 2003 to 2013 (H. Kim, 2014). A total of 348 articles regarding US-China relations were classified in terms of conflict (210 cases), cooperation (98 cases) and other (40 cases). Note that there have been twice as many conflict cases as cooperation cases for the period. Conflict over economic issues has primarily related to exchange rates, energy, and trade. Exchange rate problems concern currency valuation, where the US has been more offensive and China more defensive. They have often reproached each other but avoided catastrophe. In contrast, as the US trade deficit resulting from Chinese import penetration has expanded, economic relations have been more conflictual, especially during the Trump administration. Notably, in spite of these tensions, the two powers have successfully managed crises through strategic dialogue. Security relations between the US and China relate to North Korea, military training, and territorial disputes. Their views on how to deal with the North Korean nuclear tests and missile launches differ substantially. In addition, several conflicts concerning military training of US allies and territorial disputes in East Asia have flared, but the conflicts have been managed. The two countries, nevertheless, have narrowed the differences between their views. According to Pew Research, there have been ups and downs in conflictive and cooperative events; and sometimes they occur together. In sum, China cannot yet be categorized as a dissatisfied great power willing to challenge the US globally as a hegemon in the terms described by the power transition theory (Lee & Kim 2016).
• 

• The Korean Association of International Studies [저]

• 전체 0개의 구매후기가 있습니다.
• 

인터파크도서는 고객님의 단순 변심에 의한 교환과 반품에 드는 비용은 고객님이 지불케 됩니다. 단, 상품이나 서비스 자체의 하자로 인한 교환 및 반품은 무료로 반품 됩니다. 교환 및 반품이 가능한 경우 상품을 공급 받은 날로부터 7일이내 가능 공급받으신 상품의 내용이 표시, 광고 내용과 다르거나 다르게 이행된 경우에는 공급받은 날로부터 3개월 이내,    혹은 그사실을 알게 된 날 또는 알 수 있었던 날로부터 30일 이내 상품에 아무런 하자가 없는 경우 소비자의 고객변심에 의한 교환은 상품의 포장상태 등이 전혀 손상되지 않은 경우에 한하여 가능 교환 및 반품이 불가능한 경우 구매확정 이후(오픈마켓상품에 한함) 고객님의 책임 있는 사유로 상품 등이 멸실 또는 훼손된 경우    (단, 상품의 내용을 확인하기 위하여 포장 등을 훼손한 경우는 제외) 시간이 지남에 따라 재판매가 곤란할 정도로 물품의 가치가 떨어진 경우 포장 개봉되어 상품 가치가 훼손된 경우 다배송지의 경우 반품 환불 다배송지의 경우 다른 지역의 반품을 동시에 진행할 수 없습니다. 1개 지역의 반품이 완료된 후 다른 지역 반품을 진행할 수 있으므로, 이점 양해해 주시기 바랍니다. 중고상품의 교환 중고상품은 제한된 재고 내에서 판매가 이루어지므로, 교환은 불가능합니다. 오픈마켓 상품의 환불 오픈마켓상품에 대한 책임은 원칙적으로 업체에게 있으므로, 교환/반품 접수시 반드시 판매자와 협의 후 반품 접수를 하셔야하며,    반품접수 없이 반송하거나, 우편으로 보낼 경우 상품 확인이 어려워 환불이 불가능할 수 있으니 유의하시기 바랍니다.

배송예정일 안내 인터파크 도서는 모든 상품에 대해 배송완료예정일을 웹사이트에 표시하고 있습니다. <인터파크 직배송 상품> 상품은 월~토요일 오전 10시 이전 주문분에 대하여 당일 출고/당일 배송완료를 보장하는 상품입니다. 상품은 서울지역/평일 주문분은 당일 출고/익일 배송완료를 보장하며, 서울외지역/평일 주문분의 경우는 오후 6시까지 주문분에 대하여 익일 배송완료를 보장하는 상품입니다. (단, 월요일은 12시까지 주문에 한함) 상품은, 입고예정일(제품출시일)+택배사배송일(1일)에 배송완료를 보장합니다. ~ 상품은 유통특성상 인터파크에서 재고를 보유하지 않은 상품으로 주문일+기준출고일+택배사배송일(1일)에 배송완료를 보장합니다.(토/공휴일은 배송기간에 포함되지 않습니다.) ※기준출고일:인터파크가 상품을 수급하여 물류창고에서 포장/출고하기까지 소요되는 시간 <업체 직접배송/오픈마켓 상품> ~ 상품은 업체가 주문을 확인하고, 출고하기까지 걸리는 시간입니다. 주문일+기준출고일+택배사배송일(2일)에 배송완료를 보장합니다.(토/공휴일은 배송기간에 포함되지 않습니다.) ※5일이내 출고가 시작되지 않을시, 오픈마켓 상품은 자동으로 주문이 취소되며, 고객님께 품절보상금을 지급해 드립니다. 배송비 안내 도서(중고도서 포함)만 구매하시면 : 배송비 2,000원 (1만원이상 구매 시 무료배송) 음반/DVD만 구매하시면 : 배송비 1,500원 (2만원이상 구매 시 무료배송) 잡지/만화/기프트만 구매하시면 : 배송비 2,000원 (2만원이상 구매 시 무료배송) 도서와 음반/DVD를 함께 구매하시면 : 배송비 1,500원 1만원이상 구매 시 무료배송) 도서와 잡지/만화/기프트/중고직배송상품을 함께 구매하시면 : 2,000원 (1만원이상 구매 시 무료배송) 업체직접배송상품을 구매시 : 업체별로 상이한 배송비 적용    * 세트상품의 경우 부분취소 시 추가 배송비가 부과될 수 있습니다.    * 북카트에서 배송비없애기 버튼을 클릭하셔서, 동일업체상품을 조금 더 구매하시면, 배송비를 절약하실 수 있습니다. 해외배송 안내 인터파크도서에서는 국내에서 주문하시거나 해외에서 주문하여 해외로 배송을 원하실 경우 DHL과 특약으로 책정된 요금표에    의해 개인이 이용하는 경우보다 배송요금을 크게 낮추며 DHL(www.dhl.co.kr)로 해외배송 서비스를 제공합니다. 해외배송은 도서/CD/DVD 상품에 한해 서비스하고 있으며, 다른 상품을 북카트에 함께 담으실 경우 해외배송이 불가합니다. 해외주문배송 서비스는 인터파크 도서 회원 가입을 하셔야만 신청 가능합니다. 알아두세요!!! 도매상 및 제작사 사정에 따라 품절/절판 등의 사유로 취소될 수 있습니다. 오픈마켓업체의 배송지연시 주문이 자동으로 취소될 수 있습니다. 출고가능 시간이 서로 다른 상품을 함께 주문할 경우 출고가능 시간이 가장 긴 기준으로 배송됩니다. 유통의 특성상 출고기간은 예정보다 앞당겨지거나 늦춰질 수 있습니다. 택배사 배송일인 서울 및 수도권은 1~2일, 지방은 2~3일, 도서, 산간, 군부대는 3일 이상의 시간이 소요됩니다.