국내도서

>

사회과학

>

정치/외교

>

외교정책

• 
• 제휴몰 주문 시 고객보상, 일부 이벤트 참여 및 증정품 증정, 하루/당일 배송에서 제외되므로 참고 바랍니다.

• 
• 도서  > 사회과학  > 정치/외교  > 외교정책
• 도서  > 역사와 문화  > 한국사  > 개화기/항일시대

• 
• 
• The authors has written this book with the conviction that the "East Sea" and the "Sea of Japan" should be used together. Professor Soh Jeong-Cheol has collected old maps from the last 1960s to the 1990s. Then he joined the Society for East Sea and continued his research. In the early days, he thought that the "East Sea" was the right name and it should be used on maps in place of the "Sea of Japan." However, he gradually changed his mind: as the "Sea of Japan" has recently come into more frequent use and is supported by vested interests, it would be more rational to those with the "East Sea." To this end, the authors studied the notations and the sea between Korea and Japan on maps of many countries of the world and attempted to relate the truths about the "East Sea/Sea of Japan" as objectively as possible.
• 
• 서문 Preface When I was an elementary school student, I always went to school earlier than the other students because I lived nearby. When I arrived at the classroom, I looked up and down the Korean map on the wall everyday and read the names of the mountains, mountain ranges, and seas on it. I could see that the East Sea was larger than the Korean peninsula. The East Sea, along with the Yellow Sea to the west and the South Sea to the south, made a deep impression on me. Then, the Korean War broke out in the year when I started middle school and the school closed. The next day, I went to a coffee shop with one of my relatives and found a Korean map in English for the U.S. armed forces on a chair near the stove. I had nothing to do, so I sat and opened the map. Surprisingly, I saw “Sea of Japan” in the East Sea. It was not the same name that I had seen every day when I went to elementary school. I assumed that the name must be a misprint. “The American soldiers are ignorant and don’t know that the proper name is the ‘East Sea.’” I resolved to learn English more and tell them that they had made a mistake. It was not a particularly great shock to me, and I was so engrossed in my studies that I completely forgot about it. Then, about 15 years later in the late 1960s when I was about to finish my studies in France, I visited Versailles. There, in a living room of Louis XIV, I noticed an old terrestrial globe. I saw the small country Korea with the marking “Mer Orientale” beside it. At that moment, I screamed at myself, “That’s it! The French knew the proper name. I’ll study this!” However, I was studying French language and literature and the new topic seemed too removed from me. I, therefore, decided to tell Korean students studying Korean Studies in France what I had found when I met them at a meeting. Contrary to my expectations, they were completely indifferent. They were only interested in their research papers. When I returned to Korea, I told of my discovery to friends of mine who were newspaper reporters. They responded much more positively. One of them printed the story. It gave me a stronger sense of responsibility of a kind, and I felt obliged to prove to them that what I told them was true. I visited France during my summer vacation that year and tried to get a copy of the map that I had seen. I talked with a French student who was studying geography, and he told me that there were some map shops along the Seine. I went there and asked for an old map of Korea. What they brought me was a map with the notation “Sea of Korea” instead of “East Sea.” I bought the map anyway and showed it to the geography student. He told me that he didn’t know much about the map and proposed that we go to the library and find a catalogue of maps. After some searching, we found a record that the map that I had bought was one which was influenced by D’Anville and did not have much original content. I then decided that I would have to find a map by ...D’Anville. That decision led me to the hard life of collecting old maps. I visited France every year to collect old maps under the pretext of everything that I could think of. This was costly to me, but I could not get out of the swamp of the old maps that I happened to fall into. While collecting old maps with the notation of the East Sea, I began to wonder if calling the sea to the east of Korea the ”East Sea” was Korea-centric since such a name was obviously based on Korea's geographical position? If every country named a sea this way, wouldn’t that be a cause of confusion? A linguistic major myself, I consulted a scholar who was versed in nomenclature about this problem. He explained that, when a common noun is used as a name and then is turned a proper noun, the noun loses the etymological meaning of the common noun and is treated as a proper noun. However, when the noun contains a proper noun in the first place, the noun retains the value of the proper noun even after the name becomes a proper noun. Therefore, such names as “Sea of Korea” and “Sea of Japan” are exclusive and thus inappropriate, but “East Sea” is not: Once it becomes a proper noun, it drops the meaning of a common name, or the meaning “a sea in the east,” and remains a simple proper noun. Wherever it is seen in the world, the name “East Sea” is a proper noun, whether it is seen in the United Kingdom to the west of Korea or in Russia to its north, and not a sea to their east. To foreigners who do not know the meaning, he added that all that is needed is a note that it refers to “the sea between Korea and Japan.” I collected old maps from the late 1960s to the 1990s. I joined the Society for East Sea and continued my research. In the early days, I thought that the “East Sea” was the right name and it should be used on maps in place of the “Sea of Japan.” However, I gradually changed my mind: as the “Sea of Japan” has recently come into more frequent use and is supported by vested interests, it would be more rational to use both names. I then started to research the maps with the notation “Sea of Japan” in addition to those with the “East Sea.” I wrote this book with the conviction that the “East Sea” and the “Sea of Japan” should be used together. To this end, I studied the notations of the sea between Korea and Japan on maps of many countries of the world and attempted to relate the truths about the “East Sea/Sea of Japan” as objectively as possible. I did the overall organization for the original Korean edition of this book. However, as the problem of the name “East Sea” involves many fields, I could not do everything all by myself. I am greatly indebted to Professor Kim In-Whan for sponsoring my collection of old maps and writing the chapters about Europe in this book. For this English edition, I decided that the original Korean text needed to be revised and supplemented throughout. This work was done by Park Young-Min, who also assisted greatly in the translation of this book. I would like to thank Gimmyoung Publishers, the publisher of the original Korean book, for gladly permitting the publication of its English edition, and the Korea Foundation for sponsoring the publication of this book. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Kim In-Chul, the president of Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, for making the publication of this book possible. I also extend my appreciation to the director and staff of Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Knowledge Press. I express my thanks to Professor Suh Min-Suk for making every effort to organize the draft, despite his busy schedule. I also hereby extend my great thanks to the Society for East Sea for their substantial help in such matters as my relationship with international organizations, historical study of the name of the East Sea, and the notations of the East Sea in foreign countries, including China, Russia, and Japan. I frequently referred to the papers presented at the annual International Seminar on Sea Names hosted by the Society for the last 20 years. Finally, I earnestly hope that the East Sea will become not a flashpoint of dispute between Korea and Japan but a sea of friendship and peace between them. I have great confidence that it will. Nov. 2015 Representing the two authors, Soh Jeong-Cheol
• 
• Part I: In Search of the Lost Name, “East Sea” 1.The East Sea at a Glance 19 2.The Name “East Sea” 29 3.Different Names of the East Sea/Sea of Japan and Their Toponymy 39 4.International Organizations and the Name“East Sea” 63 5.The Name “East Sea” in the World 77 6.Map Road 91 7.Korea Road 107 Part II: Notation of the Name “East Sea” in the World 1.Arabs’ Advance to the East and Their Perceptions of Korea 127 2.Old Maps and the Notation of the Name “East Sea” in Italy 137 3.Old Maps and the Notation of the Name “East Sea” by Vatican Missionaries 147 4.Old Maps and the Notation of the Name “East Sea” in the German-speaking World 157 5.Old Maps and the Notation of the Name “East Sea” in Portugal 165 6.Old Maps and the Notation of the Name “East Sea” in the Netherlands 177 7.Old Maps and the Notation of the Name “East Sea” in France 195 8.Old Maps and the Notation of the Name “East Sea” in Great Britain 233 9.Old Maps and the Notation of the Name “East ...Sea” in Russia 255 10.Studies of the Names “East Sea” and “Sea of Japan” and their Notation in Japan 271 11.Notation of the Name “East Sea” in Chinese Historical Records 285 12.Notation of the Name “East Sea” in Korean Historical and Cultural Documents and Old Maps 311 Part III: Papers on the Notation of the Name “East Sea” 1.Japanese Studies of Old Western Maps and Their Problems with Focus on the “Origin and Functions of Geographical Names” 339 2.Why We Object to the Use of the Name “Sea of Japan” Alone? 371 References 387
• 

• Soh Jeong-Cheol [저]

• 전체 0개의 구매후기가 있습니다.
• 

인터파크도서는 고객님의 단순 변심에 의한 교환과 반품에 드는 비용은 고객님이 지불케 됩니다. 단, 상품이나 서비스 자체의 하자로 인한 교환 및 반품은 무료로 반품 됩니다. 교환 및 반품이 가능한 경우 상품을 공급 받은 날로부터 7일이내 가능 공급받으신 상품의 내용이 표시, 광고 내용과 다르거나 다르게 이행된 경우에는 공급받은 날로부터 3개월 이내,    혹은 그사실을 알게 된 날 또는 알 수 있었던 날로부터 30일 이내 상품에 아무런 하자가 없는 경우 소비자의 고객변심에 의한 교환은 상품의 포장상태 등이 전혀 손상되지 않은 경우에 한하여 가능 교환 및 반품이 불가능한 경우 구매확정 이후(오픈마켓상품에 한함) 고객님의 책임 있는 사유로 상품 등이 멸실 또는 훼손된 경우    (단, 상품의 내용을 확인하기 위하여 포장 등을 훼손한 경우는 제외) 시간이 지남에 따라 재판매가 곤란할 정도로 물품의 가치가 떨어진 경우 포장 개봉되어 상품 가치가 훼손된 경우 다배송지의 경우 반품 환불 다배송지의 경우 다른 지역의 반품을 동시에 진행할 수 없습니다. 1개 지역의 반품이 완료된 후 다른 지역 반품을 진행할 수 있으므로, 이점 양해해 주시기 바랍니다. 중고상품의 교환 중고상품은 제한된 재고 내에서 판매가 이루어지므로, 교환은 불가능합니다. 오픈마켓 상품의 환불 오픈마켓상품에 대한 책임은 원칙적으로 업체에게 있으므로, 교환/반품 접수시 반드시 판매자와 협의 후 반품 접수를 하셔야하며,    반품접수 없이 반송하거나, 우편으로 보낼 경우 상품 확인이 어려워 환불이 불가능할 수 있으니 유의하시기 바랍니다.

배송예정일 안내 인터파크 도서는 모든 상품에 대해 배송완료예정일을 웹사이트에 표시하고 있습니다. <인터파크 직배송 상품> 상품은 월~토요일 오전 10시 이전 주문분에 대하여 당일 출고/당일 배송완료를 보장하는 상품입니다. 상품은 서울지역/평일 주문분은 당일 출고/익일 배송완료를 보장하며, 서울외지역/평일 주문분의 경우는 오후 6시까지 주문분에 대하여 익일 배송완료를 보장하는 상품입니다. (단, 월요일은 12시까지 주문에 한함) 상품은, 입고예정일(제품출시일)+택배사배송일(1일)에 배송완료를 보장합니다. ~ 상품은 유통특성상 인터파크에서 재고를 보유하지 않은 상품으로 주문일+기준출고일+택배사배송일(1일)에 배송완료를 보장합니다.(토/공휴일은 배송기간에 포함되지 않습니다.) ※기준출고일:인터파크가 상품을 수급하여 물류창고에서 포장/출고하기까지 소요되는 시간 <업체 직접배송/오픈마켓 상품> ~ 상품은 업체가 주문을 확인하고, 출고하기까지 걸리는 시간입니다. 주문일+기준출고일+택배사배송일(2일)에 배송완료를 보장합니다.(토/공휴일은 배송기간에 포함되지 않습니다.) ※5일이내 출고가 시작되지 않을시, 오픈마켓 상품은 자동으로 주문이 취소되며, 고객님께 품절보상금을 지급해 드립니다. 배송비 안내 도서(중고도서 포함)만 구매하시면 : 배송비 2,000원 (1만원이상 구매 시 무료배송) 음반/DVD만 구매하시면 : 배송비 1,500원 (2만원이상 구매 시 무료배송) 잡지/만화/기프트만 구매하시면 : 배송비 2,000원 (2만원이상 구매 시 무료배송) 도서와 음반/DVD를 함께 구매하시면 : 배송비 1,500원 1만원이상 구매 시 무료배송) 도서와 잡지/만화/기프트/중고직배송상품을 함께 구매하시면 : 2,000원 (1만원이상 구매 시 무료배송) 업체직접배송상품을 구매시 : 업체별로 상이한 배송비 적용    * 세트상품의 경우 부분취소 시 추가 배송비가 부과될 수 있습니다.    * 북카트에서 배송비없애기 버튼을 클릭하셔서, 동일업체상품을 조금 더 구매하시면, 배송비를 절약하실 수 있습니다. 해외배송 안내 인터파크도서에서는 국내에서 주문하시거나 해외에서 주문하여 해외로 배송을 원하실 경우 DHL과 특약으로 책정된 요금표에    의해 개인이 이용하는 경우보다 배송요금을 크게 낮추며 DHL(www.dhl.co.kr)로 해외배송 서비스를 제공합니다. 해외배송은 도서/CD/DVD 상품에 한해 서비스하고 있으며, 다른 상품을 북카트에 함께 담으실 경우 해외배송이 불가합니다. 해외주문배송 서비스는 인터파크 도서 회원 가입을 하셔야만 신청 가능합니다. 알아두세요!!! 도매상 및 제작사 사정에 따라 품절/절판 등의 사유로 취소될 수 있습니다. 오픈마켓업체의 배송지연시 주문이 자동으로 취소될 수 있습니다. 출고가능 시간이 서로 다른 상품을 함께 주문할 경우 출고가능 시간이 가장 긴 기준으로 배송됩니다. 유통의 특성상 출고기간은 예정보다 앞당겨지거나 늦춰질 수 있습니다. 택배사 배송일인 서울 및 수도권은 1~2일, 지방은 2~3일, 도서, 산간, 군부대는 3일 이상의 시간이 소요됩니다.